Welcome!

Python Authors: Peter Velikin, Hurricane Labs, PR.com Newswire, David Smith, Hovhannes Avoyan

Related Topics: Cloud Expo, SOA & WOA

Cloud Expo: Article

Keep Eyes Wide Open When Considering SaaS

Identify business requirements during the strategic planning process

Organizations today rely heavily on their IT software to drive the business objectives to meet the needs of the market. There are a number of sophisticated software applications that have grown in demand and complexity to support an organization's value chain such as Customer Relationship Management (CRM) and, conversely, the back office, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP). In the traditional model, to meet the needs of the organization the IT department designs software, hosts applications, codifies software and manages the operational functions to distribute the internal software packages to customers.

However, while many IT departments manage this function internally, customers have recognized that IT often takes too long to deploy software packages.

Software as a Service (SaaS) disrupts the traditional software model and many buyers have recognized some advantages such as:

  • Small to medium organizations can leverage SaaS to scale and compete with large organizations to gain competitive market presence.
  • SaaS pricing structures are consumption-driven, which makes for low total cost of ownership (TCO), enabling immediate value due to rapid access to those investments.
  • Organizations struggle to get management information from their ISO quality management system. SaaS packages have allowed teams to change their focus from tactical work to the strategic need to capture and analyze information, further enabling an organization's competitive stance by relying on a factual approach to decision making to improve business outcomes.

Organizations will fail unless the following six things are done:

  1. Organizations cannot assume that by engaging in SaaS you can simply outsource software development resources. Organizations will require a governance model for technical and vendor management resources to ensure the contract value and benefits are captured. In addition, contract legal terms have to incorporate the global privacy, regulatory and loss of data due to increased hacking incidents. An organization should consider shared liability for data loss and business impact with SaaS providers.
  2. SaaS providers are constrained by their regional support organizations. Based on an organization's deployment choice, it may require the organization to consider a systems integrator to implement the solution. If an IT organization does not have a proper service management capability, they might find deploying the new services very challenging and may miss customer expectations.
  3. SaaS vendors have a great product offering when there is no customization. Many organizations view SaaS products as parallel to commercially available off-the-shelf products that are ready for use. If an organization requires customization of its SaaS products, then the business case begins to deteriorate at a significantly high rate. Without strong leadership on the buy side, what was once seen as a win-win is now deemed a false economic fallacy that will in turn leave value on the table.
  4. Organizations evaluating their vendor partners will use multiple methods. One method is the vendor financial health. Few SaaS providers are publicly traded while many are privately funded or funded by venture capitalists. This makes it difficult to evaluate vendors' financial viability. Yet SaaS providers have been opportunistic in niche markets and have cannibalized the customer base, making it more challenging to obtain a solvent partner.
  5. Many organizations have sunk costs in their already deployed internal ERP systems and may not be willing to invest in this changing model to adopt SaaS. While ERP providers don't offer commercial SaaS alternatives, they too are now evaluating future SaaS offerings to provide to their customers.
  6. The business partners are "cutting IT out of the loop" on the solution design process and bypassing capital investment committee reviews due to the SaaS TCO pricing structure. This creates new organizational and management challenges on who is accountable for managing the business value chain.

Organizations should carefully evaluate SaaS solutions as part of their decision making as they can leverage a higher degree of success in achieving their business objectives. Organizations should identify their business requirements during the strategic planning process and integrate IT service management and sourcing best practices to ensure that what you see is what you get.

More Stories By Peter Tarhanidis

Peter Tarhanidis is an IT strategy expert with PA Consulting Group and has extensive experience in IT Sourcing, Vendor & Financial Management, Project/Performance Management and IT Service Management. He identifies business best practices to IT challenges to drive innovative approaches that transform organization's people, process and technology. Peter works with clients across a range of sectors including retail, government, education, and life sciences and healthcare.

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.